Let’s start by summarizing the situation surrounding contingency fees.
For some, it might seem odd that a lawyer would be willing to take a case, including all the work involved, without 100% guaranteed payment. It seems risky, but as they say, the greater the risk, the greater the reward. At least in some cases.
When a lawyer offers a contingency fee as a payment option, they get the following benefits:
But at the end of the day, the lawyer has to draw from their experience and intuition to determine whether the risk of taking a case on a contingency fee arrangement is worth it. After all, if the case isn’t successful, then the lawyer doesn’t get paid. They also have to carefully consider each case and ensure that the percentage they’re charging is fair for them and the client they represent.
In this article, we’ll explore more about contingency fees and how they work and give you tips on how you can set your own lawyer contingency fee average for your value-based pricing law firm.
Let’s get started!
In a nutshell, a contingency fee is when a fee is paid to a lawyer if a case is successful. The definition of success and the exact amount that’s paid to the lawyer is determined in advance via negotiations between a lawyer and their client.
The law firm doesn’t set a contingency fee for each lawyer, but it may be part of their law firm pricing strategy. A contingency fee is set on a case-by-case basis by each individual lawyer. In other words, the lawyer will look at the information surrounding a case and first determine whether a contingency fee is appropriate, then specify a fair percentage based on the risk involved with the case and who is responsible for paying litigation costs (lawyer or client).
Types of cases where contingency fees are standard are outlined in the table below:
Type of case where contingency fees are common |
Example(s) |
Personal injury |
Vehicle accidents, slips and falls due to negligence |
Medical malpractice |
Botched surgery or other medical procedure leading to patient harm |
Insurance claims |
A client aiming to collect funds from an insurance claim they feel should have been covered |
Breach of contract |
When two or more parties enter into a contract, but one or more of those parties don’t uphold their part of the contract, causing the remaining party or parties to seek compensation |
Condemnation |
Conflict between government and a private landowner in claiming their property for public use |
A contingency fee seems like a good deal for the client, right? Well, some agree, but others have concerns. Some recognize that contingency fees are good because they increase access to justice for clients who would otherwise not be able to afford legal counsel. Setting a contingency fee for a case also further incentivizes the lawyer to win a case.
But on the other hand, critics point out that the amount of risk that the lawyer is assuming is too little compared to the high lawyer contingency fee average that they usually take, which is typically 33% or ⅓. Other criticisms include settling cases too soon for too little and encouraging too many frivolous suits because they’re easy to win and lawyers gain a significant percentage of the payout.
But really, if the lawyer carefully examines the facts of each case and comes up with a fair percentage that accurately reflects the risk they are taking, and allows the client to receive fair compensation, then using contingency fees does increase access to justice.
Calculating a fair contingency fee for lawyers requires a careful look at several factors, including:
That said, the most common lawyer contingency fee average ends up being 33%, or ⅓ of the total earnings of a case, but can go up to 40% (in some jurisdictions) as the complexity and risk involved in taking the case increases.
Of course, different states will have different rules regarding caps and when and how contingency fees can be paid out to the lawyer.
For example, the Florida Supreme Court dictates how these fees will work for personal injury cases (the most common type of case where contingency fees are used).
The main way that payout for contingency fees is determined in Florida, at least on a basic level, hinges on two main factors:
If the case settles before the defendant answers, then a fee cap of 33% (or ⅓) is placed on the settlement up to $1 million. If the settlement exceeds $1 million, then the cap is reduced in increments of 10% per million.
If the defendant answers within the 20-day period or the case goes to trial and is successful in favor of the injured, then the cap changes even more:
In New York, contingency fees always cap at 33% or ⅓. From there, the client and lawyer's amount hinges on what they negotiate regarding responsibility for disbursements and expenses. There are basically two options here. The first is that the client agrees to reimburse the lawyer for disbursements and expenses in exchange for a lower contingency fee percentage. The risk here falls to the client, as they are responsible for reimbursing the lawyer regardless of the case outcome. But if the case is won, then the client gets a bigger payout.
The second is basically the opposite. The lawyer assumes all the risk, including being liable for expenses and disbursements. Of course, as a result, the lawyer will take a higher contingency fee.
As you can see, the amount of money that a lawyer and a client receive from a contingency fee case can vary quite a bit depending on the state where the case is conducted. Taking all possible factors into account, then assigning a fair contingency fee percentage is the way to go.
Considering all the different factors of a case and using that information to assign a percentage that you should charge your client can be difficult. The goal, of course, is to negotiate a fair contingency fee that works for both of you.
Pricing contingency fees based on the case's complexity and not just setting a standard contingency fee to use for every case is the key to providing your clients with an ethical, fair fee.
Here are some tips that you can use to determine what your lawyer contingency fee average should be:
Your first plan of action should be determining who will be responsible for any disbursements and expenses for the case. In some cases, like our New York example above, will see the client accepting responsibility for expenses in exchange for the lawyer taking a lower percentage of the winnings for the case.
The most common scenario is that the lawyer pays for disbursements in advance and takes those fees out of the winnings of the case, aside from the contingency fee.
In either scenario, the client must have a clear understanding of exactly what they are responsible for paying. Of course, it’s possible that disbursements may end up being more than what was originally anticipated. In the case of significant changes to the expenses of a particular case, the lawyer should communicate these changes to the client immediately and discuss with them how the changes will affect the settlement or award they may receive.
Thankfully, there are a variety of options for contingency fees that lawyers and clients can use when negotiating agreement terms. These standard contingency fee approaches can be used to balance risk and fairness when setting a percentage (or percentages) for what a lawyer earns for a case.
Type of Contingency Fee |
How it Works |
Fixed percentage |
The percentage of winnings that the attorney receives remains unchanged throughout the duration of the case |
Staged or graduated |
The attorney receives a percentage that may change depending on which stage the case reaches a resolution (e.g., settlement before trial might have a lower percentage than if the case resolves after a trial) |
Partial |
The client agrees to pay legal costs (e.g., disbursements, expenses) in exchange for the lawyer taking a lower contingency fee percentage, or as a stipulation for the lawyer assuming a high-risk case |
Different states have different rules regarding when and how typical contingency fees can be charged, depending on a variety of factors. It’s important to research your state’s specific rules surrounding contingency fees so that you can ensure compliance.
Typical contingency fee rules indicate that:
Setting a fair lawyer contingency fee percentage requires paying careful attention to every factor of the case that could affect its outcome and the level of risk in terms of if the lawyer will get paid or not.
This means taking the following considerations into account:
Competitive research can be beneficial for seeing if what you’re charging (or thinking about charging) for a contingency fee for a particular case aligns with other law firms in your area. If you find that there’s a big difference in what you charge versus what they charge, you can correct it before it becomes an issue that your clients notice. If nothing else, it will help you set a starting point for how you should be pricing your legal services.
And, of course, if you have trusted colleagues that you can reach out to, ask them about their process in setting a typical contingency fee. They might have insight that you never considered. If you have a similar level of experience, reaching out can be extremely helpful for setting your own fees.
Type of Fee |
Pros |
Cons |
Contingency |
|
|
Hourly |
|
|
Providing a number of options for clients when it comes to legal fee pricing is part of being a forward-thinking law firm. But when it comes to contingency fees, the key takeaways to ensure that you’re pricing ethically include:
Providing clients with a number of pricing options, while excellent for customer service and access to legal services, can be challenging to manage without an effective software solution. With AltFee, you can manage your alternative fee arrangement pricing and collaborate with others within your firm quickly and efficiently to set the best pricing strategies for each client.
Get a demo today and see the software in action!
[product-callout]